新闻中心

近日，全球领先的工业智能监测解决方案提供商——德国Montronix公司(Montronix GmbH)在与中国企业的商标争议案件中取得终局胜利。金诚同达高级合伙人汪冬平、合伙人任雪丽、律师王潇然接受客户委托，基于金诚同达深厚的知识产权案件处理经验以及涉外客户服务经验，成功协助Montronix公司维护在华核心商标权益。

Recently, Montronix GmbH, a global leader in industrial intelligent monitoring solutions, secured a final victory in a trademark dispute against a Chinese company. The legal team at JT&N, led by Senior Partner Mr. Wang Dongping, Partner Ms. Xueli Ren, and Attorney Ms. Wang Xiaoran, successfully represented Montronix in defending its core trademark rights in China. Drawing on the firm’s deep expertise in IP litigation and cross-border legal services, JT&N helped reinforce the client’s long-term market position.

德国Montronix公司成立于1990年，长期致力于机床智能监测技术的研发，产品广泛应用于全球知名工业集团。自2010年进入中国市场以来，其产品与品牌在高端装备制造领域建立了良好声誉，在行业内具有较高的市场影响力和知名度。

Founded in 1990, Montronix GmbH has long specialized in the development of intelligent monitoring technologies for machine tools. Its products are widely adopted by leading global industrial groups. Since entering the Chinese market in 2010, the company has built a strong reputation in the high-end equipment manufacturing sector, with significant market presence and brand recognition.

某国内公司在与德国Montronix公司的交易往来中知晓其商标后，在国内实施了大量商标抢注行为。面对合作方恶意抢注核心商标的状况，金诚同达接受客户委托，通过系统梳理侵权方及其关联主体的商标注册记录、商业宣传资料，完整呈现了侵权方持续抄袭、攀附当事人及其他国际知名品牌的商标抢注和不正当竞争行为。律师团队精准把握涉外案件的审理要点，着重向法官强化了"Montronix"商标在专业领域的知名度和影响力。在一审和二审程序中，法院均全面采纳了本所主张，认定侵权方行为构成对商标注册秩序的破坏，判决维持国家知识产权局作出的无效宣告裁定。

A domestic company, having gained knowledge of the Montronix trademark through business dealings with the German company, proceeded to file a large number of bad-faith trademark applications in China. In response to this malicious attempt to register its core trademark, Montronix engaged JT&N to take legal action. JT&N’s legal team conducted a comprehensive review of the infringing party’s trademark application records and commercial promotional materials. The team demonstrated a sustained pattern of imitation, brand squatting, and unfair competition targeting Montronix and other international brands. With a strategic focus on the adjudicative requirements for cross-border IP disputes, the lawyers effectively emphasized the established reputation and influence of the “Montronix” trademark in the relevant professional field.Both the trial court and appellate court fully accepted JT&N’s arguments, ruling that the infringing party’s conduct had disrupted the trademark registration order. The courts upheld the invalidation decision issued by the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA).

本案为境外企业在中国进行商标维权提供了有益参考，验证了国际品牌通过法律途径恢复中国市场权益的可行性，同时，也展现了专业法律团队在应对复杂商业背景侵权案件中的战略价值。此外，该案件也为外国企业和外资企业在中国构建预防性知识产权保护体系提供了实践指导。

This case serves as a valuable reference for foreign companies seeking to protect their trademarks in China. It confirms the practical feasibility of restoring market rights through legal channels and highlights the strategic value of a professional legal team in navigating complex commercial infringement scenarios. Furthermore, the case provides practical guidance for foreign-invested companies aiming to establish preventive IP protection systems in China.

本案的胜诉既体现了我国司法机关对国际知名品牌的平等保护，也展示了金诚同达在处理涉外知识产权纠纷的体系化服务能力。金诚同达可为客户提供涵盖商标监测、侵权预警、行政查处及诉讼维权的全流程解决方案，为国际客户在中国发展提供兼具战略视野与本土经验的法律护航。

The successful outcome not only reflects China’s judicial commitment to equal protection for international brands but also demonstrates JT&N’s capabilities in delivering systematic legal services for foreign-related IP disputes. JT&N offers clients full-spectrum solutions covering trademark monitoring, infringement alerts, administrative enforcement, and litigation, providing international clients with legal support that combines strategic foresight with local expertise.